Probably the most useful tool I've ever learned to tackle a structural group problem is to brainstorm all the things that could be done and then organize them in 'low effort / high effort', 'low impact / high impact'.
Then do the 'high impact / low effort' things first, followed by 'low impact / low effort'.
Use the energy and momentum from those small successes for the 'high impact / high effort' things and just skip the 'low impact high effort' pitfalls.
example in next post
Below is a simplified version of a plan I made with an affinity group that frequently had fights and 'drama'.
Note that these are things that would be high or low impact and high or low effort FOR US, based on our circumstances, characters and schedules. They will vary for others.
The most important thing to make this work is make sure you do not over-burden your group. Make sure you start with only about 2 things to do and make sure they're really 'low effort'. Then plan another 2, etc.
i can definitely envisage making use of this in my group!
@queeranarchism this seems a lot less stressful than the urgent/important grid my boss used to have us use
Yeah, makes sense. The urgent/important boxes get used in a deadline-focused work setting.
Whereas the effort/impact gets used when maintaining energy and preventing burn out are prioritized.
@queeranarchism that explains the reduction in stress, then
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!