compsci teacher's making us store gender as an enum to prove we know how enums work so i decided to have fun with it
@keith legacy genders
@sidd_harth0_5h4h they're commonly used and insecure, you really should be using a gender manager these days
@keith yes, good, A+ grade, you are a compsci doctor now
@keith I'd do a three-state
@ben lmao yeah
@keith Please put a GenderFluid option, which is a list of elements that are fluid at standard room temperature
and also GenderSolid and GenderPlasma
@keith bless ✨
@keith Hey, male and female are perfectly good! I'm male and will not change that. >,,>
Further, if heated to its decomposition temperature, “woman” separates into at least two other genders, butch and femme. Since modern gender science has shown us that “woman” is not an elemental gender, we must also examine whether “man” is a compounded gender-substance. Thus far, indications for its unity are not promising.
Long before anyone had figured out that cells exist, anatomy was the only marker of sex. And it came about that somewhere in the merger of Medieval French and Old/Middle English, “femelle” was documented as indicating “any creature that has a cunt”. (Literally. It was a simple body-part name back then, with nothing vulgar about it.) And the reverse for “male”/“masle”.
So today, in the mainstream English language, when someone says “male”, it’s a sex. And conflating sex with gender is something it’d be really nice if that mainstream would stop doing. I didn’t intend to catch you in that crossfire, either, Frost.
(Also, I wonder what ordinary four-legged wolves call their genders? English seems unlikely to represent them well.)
and I maintain that with "male" shifting into being a whole Identity, it's now a gender even if it didn't /used/ to be. I mean, *pawgestures at himself* I'm male and that's completely independent of my junk. It happens to match but it doesn't have to – a couple of my headmates are female and have outie junk too!
“Trans<gender>” (no space) is the dominant usage I’ve seen among the trans* folks I know, so it’s what I use. Proponents of each claim that *theirs* is the one that’s more true to perceiving the person so described as belonging to that persons’ felt-gender. Because language is !!FUN!! :D
The point I was trying to make, though, is that regardless of whether someone calls themselves a transman or a trans man, they’re *men*, regardless of whether the biological components which aggregate into the property “sex” are in any particular state. (Someones’ visible anatomy, karyotype, and hormonal status can be *very* disparate from one another, without any involvement from the medical system.)
Some transmen (and trans men) also have a problem with their starting genitalia. Some don’t. Anatomy doesn’t make ‘em any more or less men.
I’m saying that there’s about a thousand years of weight behind a different meaning of the word which you’re using to *describe* your gender. It is entrenched in English, and people are therefore likely to misunderstand you—as I did!
Selecting some other word(s) to describe your gender when interfacing with people other than your headmates is likely to save you repeated triggerings, given that you also keep company with other people who are invested in cleaving the words for sexes from those for genders. Since you’re non-binary to begin with, and a nontrivial amount of that is the wolf-aspects of your gender, maybe something along the lines of ’wolf (male)’ would express what you’re after in a way that’s less likely to be misinterpreted?
Up to you, of course.
(reminds of the PHP genders)
@keith i meant those
My gender is vulnerable and should be updated.
Click >here< to update your gender!
@keith change it to some sort of n-dimensional data structure if you want to really drive the point home 😁
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!